Am 06.01.2004 um 17:01 schrieb TheSin:
break it how, the 0-2 switch ? Cause I just explained that, i didn't want to change it, Clef and drm and other where upset that some depends had to be present in builddepends as well. But in my mind that is correct, they disagreed with me so I changed it.Once again:
1) Clef and drm were right (I am basing this on what you write, I don't know the original conversation), in so far as that indeed, if something is in "Depends", then it always is automatically also a BuildDepends, *except* if it's a relative of the package.
2) So, are you saying that there are cases where this is not true? If so it's a bug in the dep engine and should be *properly* fixed. Please give an example of such buggy behaviour, than I can take a look
3) Still, if there is such an issue, then the change from build mode 2 to another mode did never fix it - it may have, for some obscure reasons, hid the problem, but that's all...
Cheers,
Max
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
