On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > > > >Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good > >part of the problem. It really needs some sort of way to differentiate > >items that are waiting for the submitter to respond from items that are > >waiting for an "official fink person" to tend to. > > There is one thing that fink developers could do right now: > > If you take over a tracker item so that it is waiting for further input, > change its status from "Open" to "Pending". It is possible to display > only those packages that are "Pending", or those that are "Open". The > latter would then be those that have not yet received any attention.
Would the flip-side then be that the original submitter needs to change it back to "Open" when he submits an updated .info or whatever? dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
