On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:12:17PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Kevin Horton wrote:
> >
> >Yeah, I suspected the functionality of the package tracker was a good 
> >part of the problem.  It really needs some sort of way to differentiate 
> >items that are waiting for the submitter to respond from items that are 
> >waiting for an "official fink person" to tend to.
> 
> There is one thing that fink developers could do right now:
> 
> If you take over a tracker item so that it is waiting for further input, 
> change its status from "Open" to "Pending". It is possible to display 
> only those packages that are "Pending", or those that are "Open". The 
> latter would then be those that have not yet received any attention.

Would the flip-side then be that the original submitter needs to
change it back to "Open" when he submits an updated .info or whatever?

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to