This sounds a lot like portage.

On Feb 3, 2004, at 8:46 PM, Joe Corneli wrote:
You hit the nail on the head there.  It isn't just the compile-time
options, but several details of the lynx configuration file that
need to be fiddled with.  However, the problem with making a new
package is we'd probably have to have four, which seems a bit silly

I think cookie support would deserve to be in the main package; what's involved in adding it?
(Note that I don't actually use lynx; I just maintain it)


lynx
lynx-cookies
lynx-ssl
lynx-ssl-cookies




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to