Fair enough. I'm happy that it is so easy to change compile time
options.  But I'm still interested in a more "intelligent" software
managing system for sometime down the road.  One would have to do a
lot of prep work, however, it seems quite conceivable that one would
be able to leverage the software to keep the amount of bug tracking
work the same as it is now or lessen it.  As you point out, there is
a lot of repetition in the mailing list.  If it was possible to
include the knowledge gained by these experiments directly in the
package manager, there'd be less traffic of the kind you're talking
about.


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to