How does Debian handle this type of situation for their linux distros? Has anyone tried asking the upstream folks for these packages not to do this?
dan On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:53:16AM -0700, TheSin wrote: > dpkg does in the docs yes, but I've tested it with apt and dpkg and it > doesn't hurt anything...but what ever I'll play god and change the > upstream version. > > On 3-Feb-04, at 4:39 AM, Max Horn wrote: > > > >The dpkg specification explicitly forbids using "_" in the version, > >and in fact our specs never allowed it, either (though we never > >explicitly forbid it, either). -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel