On Feb 15, 2004, at 1:56 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
So I tend to agree with Remi that, given the patches which already exist,
something like 300K is probably a more reasonable cutoff than 30K.
Or maybe something in between, like 100K?
Why? You're being 'arbitrary' again. :) I based my number on looking at what packages were in fink already. It's quite rare that a package has to go over 30. 100K is extremely rare (only one or two, many of which are packaging errors). 50 might be acceptable. We can also consider whether a package will be used by many people, for example a 70K patch should be fine for KDE since it is a very popular thing.
Whatever, i'm done..
And whats with the 'Hi Ben,' condescension, Dave?
-Ben
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
