So AFAICT, there's going to be some serious problem with this package if someone upgrades from 10.2 to 10.3, but I don't know how to fix that. They get a new libopenbabel.0.dylib which is actually *newer* than their 10.2 version.
Yes, Jestin will have a headache.
So our upstream library version is going to have to get bumped up, no question about it.
It also does not have any patches whatever ...?
Why would you want a package with patches? :-)
My point was that it is getting a shared library without patches, so the "upstream" may have a library versioning problem too :) This will be a problem for Justin as you will presumably now set CURRENT to 1, and get libopenbabel.1.dylib which already appeared in the 10.2 openbabel package.
I have no clue how he can deal with that without breakage, but perhaps I'm overlooking something.
Peter -- Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
