Hi, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Max Horn wrote: > I would greatly prefer if we do *not* add an init.zsh unless we > absolutely must.
Sure, that's actually why I decided to post it to the list rather than through a request tracker -- people can make up their own minds if they want this on their own systems or not. (There is, however, a mistake in init.sh in CVS for which I will submit a report if one does not already exist.) > It would simply complicate setup for the novice user (and complicate > the docs, too). Well, setup is already complicated for users that have Zsh as their shell, because init.sh generates error messages and hasn't worked since last year. (In my experience, at least.) Although it may be undesirable to maintain a third file, or to modify pathsetup.command, two potential advantages of a Zsh version are that the code is easier to understand and revise, and would not break with new (backward-compatible) versions of Zsh. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
