Since it has been broken there has been little to no mentioning of it being broken, which leads me to believe that we do not have too many zsh users. While that does not necessarily facilitates a necessity not to support zsh properly, it does imply that we might be better off trying to integrate as much support as possible into the existing setup procedure while covering possible mistakes in proper documentation or a special section of the FAQ.
Does this sound reasonable to you zsh users out there? If so I will gladly listen to the specifics of ZSH and mail those "question/Answer" pairs to the FAQ maintainer.
Well, perhaps the problems are subtle enough that they are not noticed. I've been using zsh 4.1.1 as my default shell for many weeks, and hadn't noticed any problems. So the fact that no one has been complaining may not imply that there are few zsh users.
I am interested in having info on any zsh specific problems in the docs somewhere.
Kevin Horton
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
