I thought that Dan had fixed all those by changing the .info files to use here-doc format? Perhaps he only did the 10.3 tree?
On Mar 13, 2004, at 12:29 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Correct _ and none are missed. It is just a problem when using alsoI'm pretty sure that's been fixed in all of 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3 for a few weeks now. If there are some I missed, feel free to send me the fink index output and I'll fix them in CVS ASAP.
"unsupported" trees (eg , I use also 10.2 (and still an old copy of the 'not-ready'
branch) _ and before removing them I would like to find once the time to
check all those that build correctly _ maybe with local modifs _
and are not yet in 10.3)
Those are clean (at least in this respect...)
The only way (using supported fink trees) I think one would see this would be if you have your own personal .info files.
It's very difficult to have only the validator catch these (since it uses the same parsing routine as fink itself) or to force people to run 'fink validate' so I made that message un-optional in order to give you lead-time to fix your stuff.
I understand _ but no need to see those same 650 warnings N times a day _ eg every time you make a minor change to an info file ... Sufficient to be warned once...
Best,
Jean-Francois
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
