Martin, if you could re-read slowly my post,
1 - I've said the package is not released yet, so I've provided a link to the snapshot, so that it could be tested locally (i.e. by putting it in /sw/src).
Putting the tarball into /sw/src doesn't help if fink looks for a wrong source file name which was the case for bluefish-gnome2. But I don't understand why you still don't put the right URL into the info file (s/downloads/snapshots) so that it works without manual download.
2 - I did not say I cannot test with gnome1, just a matter to install it, may make one day on the g3
I guess I still don't quite understand why you said you could not test both variants while you can now. Let's leave it there.
BTW, fink validate doesn't yet seem to understand variants completely:
% fink validate bluefish.info
Error: Package name may only contain lowercase letters, numbers,'.', '+' and '-' (bluefish.info)
Same for fink validate gnome2, so it's not a bug in bluefish.info, but in fink validate.
-- Martin
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel