Jeremy Higgs wrote: <snip>
On a side note, is there any problem with having one ettercap info file that supports the -ssl and -gtk variants? I was under the impression that SSL stuff had to be kept under the crypto section, but haven't been following development for quite a while, so I don't know if the situation has changed. Can anyone shed some light on that? It would be nice to just have one package description file for all four variants...<snip>
Yes. The -ssl "variant" _cannot_ be packaged in a single file unless your file will always live in the crypto tree. A good example would be my msmtp package. Which builds either with openssl as msmtp-ssl or with gnutls. Both "Variants" require the file to be in the "crypto" tree thus it is ok.
IN you case you have a blah-ssl file which lives in the crypto tree and a blah.info whith all the variants you need/want that lives in the normal tree.
-d
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
