-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
Christian Schaffner wrote: <snip> | | The new apt could go into fink anyway, no? Are there any risks in just | adding the new apt.info file to the unstable tree? | As I did not have any time to look at this yet. Is this a patch against the _latest_ upstream source? APT needs an update, Peter (pogma) was working on it, but I do nto know how far he got.
- -d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFBW8khPMoaMn4kKR4RA3/YAKCTzFvkveKWVBrruUDh4h/KRylNmQCfdOQb qirv8isSYWla2AnoCtvf+Dc= =umn4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
