David R. Morrison wrote: > My reading of the links you provided suggests that you are correct: we may > not link GPL'd software against fink's openssl package unless the license > explictly permits linking to openssl. (In many cases, there is an > alternative -- link to the system's openssl -- although this is not great > because it doesn't get updated as frequently.)
To me, it would seem kind of arbitrary for openssl 0.9.6 to be allowed, but 0.9.7 to not be just because we're building our own copy of it. When Apple releases some future OS release with 0.9.7 on it, is it magically OK suddenly? ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
