-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
Daniel E. Macks wrote: | David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: | |>Here's my take on this licensing issue, for what it's worth. |> |>I think we should explicitly indicate that authors of .info files are |>*contributing* those files to the fink project when they submit them for |>inclusion in the fink trees. As contributed parts of the whole, these |>files may be modified by others working on fink, and will be distributed |>along with fink and under the same license conditions as fink itself | | | That makes a lot of sense. We should add a note about this on the | Submissions tracker new-item header. | Actually we should communicate this on the fornt page and add a good explanation as a seperate page why we are doinbg this and who agreed on doing it. so please give me the outline and I shall happily do the rest. ~ Even though I still pledge for dual licensing
- -d
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCSpcPPMoaMn4kKR4RA1asAJ9N/muPA75wB9UW0qrRWx04I64kvwCffCIS +kyoJ1Hg8Co/+u1WvjXZ/Wo= =Rlmz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
