Thanks guys. Chris' suggestion seems somewhat easier to implement, so
I'll give that one a go.
- Koen.
On Jun 28, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:28 AM, Chris Dolan wrote:
The /sw/bin files should go in a -bin splitoff. See
spreadsheet-writeexcel-pm.info for a simple example. Note that there
should perhaps also be a -man splitoff.
On Jun 27, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
During the installation of soap-lite-pm586, I got an error for some
conflicting files that were already installed by soap-lite-pm581:
/sw/bin/SOAPsh.pl
/sw/bin/SOAPsh.pl
sw/bin/XMLRPCsh.pl
Hi Koen,
A slightly better solution than just a -bin splitoff may be to have
versioned binaries.
So soap-lite-pm586 would contain %p/bin/SOAPsh-586.pl, and
soap-lite-pm581 would contain %p/bin/SOAPsh-581.pl, allowing both sets
of binaries to be installed at the same time.
If you want the user to be able to use shorter names, you can *also*
have a -bin splitoff. Then soap-lite-pm586-bin would contain
/sw/bin/SOAPsh.pl as a symlink to SOAPsh-586.pl, and ditto with
pm581-bin, so that a user could use a shorter name for the programs.
Of course the -bin packages have to Conflicts/Replace each other.
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
