On Wednesday, 16 August 2006 at 23:13, Asko Kauppi wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Lua51 is otherwise okay, but it lacks the user's possibility of
> having plain 'lua' command launch the installed version of Lua. The
> older (5.0) 'lua' package has this command; 5.1 uses 'lua51' instead
> to avoid any conflicts ('lua51' and 'lua' don't overlap elsewhere).
>
> Should I use 'update-alternatives' as part of the 'lua51' package; if
> I do that, wouldn't it actually make 'lua51' package conflict with
> 'lua', since the latter does _not_ use 'update-alternatives', it
> simply installes the %p/bin/lua binary.
>
> Or, can I craft and push to Fink a newer version of 'lua' package,
> that contains nothing but the 'update-alternatives' scripts, and does
> indeed replace older lua (since using its name).
I'd suggest simply using update-alternatives in lua51, and
conflicting/replacing lua. lua could be updated to lua50 and use
update-alternatives too if necessary.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
