On 21/07/2008, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michal Suchanek wrote: > > | Perhaps there could be -nox variant of this package as well. Certainly > | an option to build the package without exrdisplay would be helpful > | much like ImageMagick without display. > | > | I guess djvulibre would be pretty much the same. > > Do they depend on the openexr command-line tools specifically? Or the C > interface? > > OpenEXR is built static-only, so you don't need a runtime dependency of > any kind if you're just using the libs.
You need all the stuff that is required by openexr to build openexr-dev to build imagemagick. Since we have pretty much no bindist build dependencies are what most people see ... Thanks Michal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
