I've updated the proposed meschach packaging to now pass 
' -compatibility_version 1 -current_version 0' to gcc
and to create a libmeschach.0.dylib with libmeschach.dylib 
symlink for main meschach package. I am still uncertain of
what is the most honest value to use for the compatibility
version. The http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~dstewart/meschach/
web page doesn't address the soversion issue. I guess the
1.2b release can be considered to be 'out' and the version
of 1 is okay. I thought the only case where a compatibility
version of 0 should be used is if the first release of a
software package hasn't really occcured yet. In any case,
I think I'll be checking meschach in this weekend after I touch
up the descriptions in the info file.
                   Jack

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to