On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:04:20PM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 6/2/10 7:55 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >   One possible workaround might be to change gcc45.info
> > to reduce the number of parallel builds so that the
> > load sensitivity is reduced. So instead of using...
> >
> >  num_cpu=$(echo `sysctl -n hw.ncpu`)
> >  make -j $num_cpu
> >
> > we would reduce num_cpu by one if greater
> > than one so that the build is either serial
> > or leaves a free core whenever building in parallel.
> > This won't 'fix' the problem but it might make
> > it less likely.
> 
> So if GCC's build is not repeatably compatible with -jN, then it
> should probably not be doing it by default.  :P

  This is a recent regression upstream. The question is do you
penalize all users with multiple core machines for those
unlucky users running two cores at high load? As I said before,
a rational (and less extreme) workaround would be to leave
a free core available to reduce the load on the machine.
I build gcc trunk nightly and have never seen this failure
on a dual quad.
             Jack


> 
> - -- 
> Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick a.k.a. Raccoon Fink
> Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development
> 
> Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/
> Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iD8DBQFMBvGEUu+jZtP2Zf4RAtxeAJ0ZctvhIXIgG+wqnsN2dzRthfnflACgieJi
> 5ic3e4dd97RoT+uw5fpYJTg=
> =hzbI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to