Results on my slow-a** powerpc-apple-darwin8 are finally in! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-08/msg01506.html
Latest packaging for 10.4(ppc) looks good to me. I had one non-important suggestion for those of us who like to run the testsuite: perhaps in TestScript, run the test_summary script and save it to some file to be installed with docs/. In the case when tests are not run, perhaps touch an empty results file, so the .deb looks the same whether or not the testsuite is run. Fang > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The older version at least _builds_ on 10.4, but, yeah, I haven't done > any compiling with it. > > On 8/13/10 5:21 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Are we sure folks aren't having problems with the >> existing gcc45-4.5.0-1000 release on 10.4? My undestanding >> was that the same issue requiring --with-dwarf2 should >> have existed there as well (since gcc 4.5 defaults to dwarf2 >> and gcc in the Xcode for 10.4 still defaults to stabs). >> Jack >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:08:09PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote: >>> Sounds good to me. Maybe we should hear from the Jacks as well. >>> >>> -- Dave >>> >>> >>> On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>> >> How about if I implement the following then: >> >> change the extant gcc45-10.4.info to look for gcc45-10.4.patch >> copy the extant gcc45.patch to gcc45-10.4.patch >> commit the 10.5 and 10.6-relevant files (gcc45.patch, gcc45.info, >> gcc45-x86_64.info) from the tracker >> >> ? >> >> That way we will have the updated gcc45 in 10.5 and 10.6, with the >> option to update it in 10.4. >> >> On 8/11/10 9:19 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: >>>>>> If I could make a small suggestion on this thread. Fink's support for >>>>>> 10.4 will end fairly soon, so it would not be such a bad thing if gcc >>>>>> 4.5.1 only runs on 10.5 and 10.6. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:48:45PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >>>>>> On 8/11/10 4:56 PM, Jack Fink wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Salut Jack, >>>>>>>>>> the problem on 10.4-i386 (with 2 dwarves) is that the build tries to >>>>>>>>>> build something as x86_64, which can't succeed with a 32bit >>>>>>>>>> libc.dylib. >>>>>>>>>> Cheers (and thanks for putting that much brain/time/effort into gcc!) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -jack >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jack, >>>>>>>> Is this with Xcode 2.5? I'm surprised I didn't hear about this >>>>>>>> problem before although I do see... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Historical Footnote: Compiling 64-Bit Command-Line Code for Mac OS X >>>>>>>> v10.4 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mac OS X v10.4 supports some 64-bit executables. However, Mac OS X >>>>>>>> v10.4 does not include a full 64-bit stack; Mac OS X v10.4 contains >>>>>>>> only libSystem and the Accelerate framework in 64-bit versions. In >>>>>>>> addition, Mac OS X 10.4 includes neither the Objective-C runtime nor a >>>>>>>> 64-bit Objective-C-capable version of dyld. Because of these >>>>>>>> differences, if you try to execute a 64-bit executable in 10.4 that >>>>>>>> depends on these 10.5-specific features, it would crash. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To prevent new 64-bit executables from running as 64-bit on version >>>>>>>> 10.4, Apple changed the CPU subtype for 64-bit executables that depend >>>>>>>> on high-level frameworks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you need to compile an executable as 64-bit for Mac OS X v10.4, you >>>>>>>> must select the 10.4 deployment target when building 64-bit >>>>>>>> executables and separate your code into a 32-bit front-end (GUI) >>>>>>>> portion and a 64-bit back-end (processing) portion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/64bitPorting/building/building.html. >>>>>>>> Did the any of the previous gcc4x packages build the x86_64 multilib >>>>>>>> under 10.4? >>>>>>>> Jack >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And you got an error with the prior iteration (no dwarf2) ? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Make an app they can't live without >>>>>>> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge >>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Fink-devel mailing list >>>>>>> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel >>>>>>> Subscription management: >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel >> > > - -- > Alexander Hansen > Fink User Liaison > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkxl2wUACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+B3ACdFLKPO1bFisNxJ0qYVWQxHaXB > jt8An1rVBiZa0cz6srL94Cy2Wox86ZXJ > =v6H0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Fink-devel mailing list > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
