PS: Some further IMHO problematic examples:
w3m-ssl 0.5.2-1004 Upgrade package for w3m
-> this sounds as if the package provides some extra "upgraded" functionality
for w3m.
openssl097 0.9.7m-6 Upgrade package for old
openssl097* layout
-> similar issue, or worse, outright confusing ;)
ekg 1.7-1 Compatibility binary package
-> "compatibility" is a very broad term, and while certainly appropriate here,
it can be easily misunderstood.
If people agree it's a good idea to change the descriptions to something more
uniform, I'd look into doing this (including contacting/notifying the affected
maintainers).
Cheers,
Max
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
