On 4/3/12 6:23 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Mar 29, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> Dear all, >> a small clarification: >> >> >> Am 28.03.2012 um 17:46 schrieb Max Horn: >> >>> Dear package authors, >>> >>> I would like to suggest the following to all package authors using >>> >>> Depends: fink-obsolete-packages >>> >>> in an obsolete splitoff in one of their packages: Namely, please switch to >>> using >>> >>> Depends: fink (>= 0.32) >>> RuntimeDepends: fink-obsolete-packages >> This should be >> BuildDepends: fink (>= 0.32) >> RuntimeDepends: fink-obsolete-packages > > Max, > > Does this apply for splitoffs only, or for standalone info files as well? > > Example: Buildbot split into master and slave packages upstream. There is a > buildbot-py.info that depends on fink-obsolete-packages and the two new > separate .info files. > > Or is this for *all* "Depends: fink-obsolete-packages" such that someone > could do a full tree build and not pick up fink-obsolete-packages? > I'm guessing it's primarily for Splitoffs.
The overall goal is to avoid having users install fink-obsolete-packages when the packages they're building aren't actually obsolete. :-) -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/got-job/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
