On 10/18/2015 1:27 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Oct 14, 2015, at 5:19 PM, Alexander Hansen <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> For people who want to test this out for their packages, but don’t always >> live on the bleeding edge and use git master, I recommend using branch_0_39, >> because you can then use “fink selfupdate” to get newer fink releases as >> usual. > > Should we hold off on committing updated info files? I saw that a few > packages on the list on the wiki are crossed out already. Or should we commit > them as "restrictive", then update the license field after 0.39.x+1 lands?
Either solution is fine. If your stuff actually needs OpenSSL, the new License types should be in the next fink release (release date unknown) and it's up to you if you want to wait or mark them as Restrictive temporarily. Regardless of your choice, they won't be buildable on 10.11 unless the system-openssl-dev BuildDependency is updated/removed. Hanspeter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
