well i did state almost just incase though i have never hit one that i
couldn't move to qt3. some require a little work. though it is quiet
possible and in those cases I think we should bug the upstream maintainer
to update his instance of qt.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I tried this once with a package (*) that said it wanted qt-2, not qt-3.
>It seems it had its reasons. I didn't succeed. With qt-2, it built
>almost by itself.
>
>I never submitted this because of the need for qt-3 of other packages,
>but now with qt-shlibs-3, it just might be possible. But then the
>developer of that package seems to have moved to qt-3 recently, too.
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
