On Friday, May 17, 2002, at 04:51 , Justin Hallett wrote:
> I just skimmed through this, but to me if I'm following, it would > include > them all, now the order would only matter for redefs, but the question > is, > does it need both, or only expect one? My reading is that, since ftglyph.h belongs only to freetype2, and all the includes that I mentioned as well, it should expect /sw/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h, and only that (freetype2 should be useable without freetype..) And I thought that, once it has found freetype/freetype.h in /sw/include, it does not hunt further for other occurrences of freetype/freetype.h... > Are there #ifdef or #ifndef > statements? maybe the freetype stuff should be #ifdef HAVE_FREETYPE2 > blah > #else include freetype. There are #ifdef's and #ifndef's, but not of the type you mention, and my reading of them was that the include statements I mentioned did get executed. > So in conclusion, the point being that freetype and > freetype2 are either not really able to co exist Just that if the '-dev'-s co-exists, then when freetype2 is needed, -I/sw/include/freetype2 should come before -I/sw/include > or is it mozilla that > should be choosing one or the other? ? Jean-Francois _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
