Max, You are right. I stand corrected. Nevertheless, I'm suggesting that we should consider pre-building unstable binaries to broaden the base of unstable testers. If bandwidth to dl.sourceforge.net is an issue, then we might consider utilizing the Debian mirror structure. Another distribution tree in their hierarchy wouldn't be much overhead and may give a larger user base to Fink. If they support deb distribution tree for FreeBSD Alpha, then Darwin PPC isn't that much of a stretch. Just a thought.
Brian On 9/19/02 2:53 PM, "Max Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 13:35 Uhr -0400 19.09.2002, Brian Schott wrote: >> I agree we could use a binary unstable distribution like Debian. Any chance >> we could merge back with Debian > > Sorry but I have to correct this: we can not "merge back" with > debian, as we never "split off" of debian. Fink is a completly > independant project. We only happen to use the same lower level tools > (dpkg/apt). Otherwise we are completly unrelated. > > > Max _____________________________________________________________ Brian Schott, Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] USC Information Sciences Institute ph:703-812-3722 3811 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 200 fx:703-812-3712 Arlington, VA 22203 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
