If you installed freetype2 before updating XFree86, that would account for the version number/date conundrum.
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Mich�le Garoche wrote: > > Le lundi, 3 mars 2003, � 19:57 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a �crit : > > > It seems to work fine for me. Maybe one of your dependenceies (gtk+?) > > needs to be reinstalled/rebuilt. > Yes, I think so, but I don't know how to resolve the problem. > > I've posted today this in learning gtk+2.0: > > > 3 - When inspecting both /sw and /usr directories I've found this: > > > > In /sw/lib/: > > > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 1249064 Jan 6 16:34 > > libfreetype.6.3.0.dylib* > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 23 Mar 3 08:31 > > libfreetype.6.dylib -> libfreetype.6.3.0.dylib* > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 1339372 Jan 6 16:34 libfreetype.a > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 23 Mar 3 08:31 > > libfreetype.dylib -> libfreetype.6.3.0.dylib* > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 738 Jan 6 16:34 libfreetype.la* > > > > in /usr/X11R6/lib/: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 272520 Feb 14 22:57 > > libfreetype.6.2.dylib > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 21 Feb 17 10:20 > > libfreetype.6.dylib -> libfreetype.6.2.dylib > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 351624 Feb 14 22:57 libfreetype.a > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root admin 21 Feb 17 10:20 > > libfreetype.dylib -> libfreetype.6.2.dylib > > > > Why a different version on /sw and on /usr? The 6.3.0 on /sw seems > > from the version number be more recent, but the dates seem to tell the > > contrary. > > If you have any idea, feel free to share :-) > > Mich�le > <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org/> > > -- Alexander K. Hansen Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University visiting MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Levitated Dipole Experiment 175 Albany Street, NW17-219 Cambridge, MA 02139-4213 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
