So you are saying that I can take system-ghostscript8 from 10.2-gcc3.3 branch and modify it. And what about all these packages that depend from system-ghostscript?? Will be they all satisfied?

Andrea.

On 20 Jan 2004, at 17:20, Martin Costabel wrote:

There used to exist the opinion that it is not very cumbersome to have two ghostscripts installed, but I think this should be rethought. And there should be a system-ghostscript8, in any case. OTOH, ghostscript6 and its system package could be scrapped.

The current situation with support for several ghostscript versions dates from an ancient period when ghostscript was changing rapidly and there were several competing distributions. AFAICT this is over now. Nobody is using ghostscript6 any more, and ghostscript7 is a leftover, too, used only by some legacy code.

Actually, even the fink ghostscript8 package is very old. I have been using a modified one that replaces version 8.00 by 8.11 for several months without any problem.

---
Andrea Riciputi

"Science is like sex: sometimes something useful comes out,
  but that is not the reason we are doing it" -- (Richard Feynman)



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to