Jonathan Levi MD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I'd really like to suggest upgrading our imagemagick pagkages from > the 5.5.1-23 and 5.5.6-23 in our respective stable and unstable > trees. ImageMagick itself is currently offering 6.0.6-2 "Stable", > 6.0.7 "Beta" at its web site. I've built 6.0.6-2 myself and have been > using it for a week (admittedly, only the "convert" application) > without problems. Why not at least put 6.0.6-2 "Stable" in our > unstable tree?
I see 10.3/unstable just got upgraded to 6.0.7-1. Regarding our stable tree, we need positive feedback about a package before we move it to stable. So if you find a package in unstable that works well but is not in stable, please tell the maintainer or let us know on fink-devel. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
