On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:39:26PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > Robert T Wyatt wrote: > > > >fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual dependency. > >The candidates: > > > >(1) boost1.32-py23: Portable Peer-review C++ Source Libraries > >(2) boost1.32-py24: Portable Peer-review C++ Source Libraries > > You can actually choose whichever you want here. The dependency of the > boost1.32-pyXX packages on a specific python version is bogus. I am not > the maintainer and cannot fix it.
Is the "real" solution to switch boost1.32.python to build all the .dylib and convert boost1.32-pyXX to build only the python bindings (linking against boost1.32.python)? That way other packages that need just the boost libs could avoid the bogus python version choice? dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
