thanks

Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 2/10/07, Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> > On 2/10/07, Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi there,
>> >>
>> >> OSX-10.4.8
>> >> fink - 0.5.4
>> >>
>> >> why is this happening?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> updating all with fink commander fails with the following output:
>> >>
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Validation of splitoffs failed.
>> >> Can't resolve dependency "system-perl586" for package
>> >> "intltool-0.35.4-101"
>> >> (no matching packages/versions found)
>> >> Exiting with failure.
>> >>
>> >
>> > The version of the Fink distribution you have is way outdated for
>> > 10.4--0.5.4 was a distro for 10.2 before gcc3.3 came out.  Your "fink"
>> > tool presumably doesn't know how to generate the system-perl586
>> > virtual package.
>> >
>> > Try using Binary->Update and Binary->dist-upgrade to upgrade to a
>> > later Fink distro and fink tool.
>> >
>>
>>
>> thanks Alexander,
>>
>> Binary->Update runs fine and announces "done"
>>
>> but the
>>
>> Binary->dist-upgrade is not working all too well.
>>
>> here is the output:
>>
>> --- snip ---
>>
>> Reading Package Lists...
>> Building Dependency Tree...
>> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
>> 3 packages not fully installed or removed.
>> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
>> Setting up pango1-xft2 (1.6.0-1002) ...
>> dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.2.dylib
>>   Referenced from: /sw/bin/pango-querymodules
>>   Reason: no suitable image found.  Did find:
>>     /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.2.dylib: mach-o, but wrong architecture
>> /sw/sbin/update-pango-modules: line 15:  1079 Trace/BPT trap
>> pango-querymodules >$TMPFILE
>> /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing pango1-xft2 (--configure):
>>  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 133
>> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gtk+2:
>>  gtk+2 depends on pango1-xft2 (>= 1.4.0-1); however:
>>   Package pango1-xft2 is not configured yet.
>> /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing gtk+2 (--configure):
>>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
>> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ethereal:
>>  ethereal depends on gtk+2; however:
>>   Package gtk+2 is not configured yet.
>> /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing ethereal (--configure):
>>  dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
>> Errors were encountered while processing:
>>  pango1-xft2
>>  gtk+2
>>  ethereal
>> E: Sub-process /sw/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>>
>> ---- snip ---
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > The "validation of splitoffs failed" stuff is an overzealous warning
>> > that is really intended for maintainers rather than users.  Nothing
>> > for you to do.
>> >
>> > I'm a bit perplexed, though, because you're somehow updating to the
>> > intltool on 10.4/unstable, but you claim to be on the 0.5.4
>> > distribution.
>>
>
> Ah, I guess you're on an Intel Mac (you didn't specify, and I should
> have asked).  You can't migrate a PowerPC Fink distro to Intel:
>
> http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#wrong-arch
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to