On 3/6/07, Peter Lampione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What a pain in the ...!!
> Then we ask why linux has no wider adoption.
>
> Just as a case in point, I have decided to switch all my relatives (some 7
> people in all) all to Mac machines, away from linux - it was too much of a
> pain for me to be everybody's system manager, compile this, download
> that... (I spent a couple of hours on Sunday building nvidia packages in
> Debian because the executables cannot be had via apt-get.  I've had enough
> of this bullshit; I have better things to do in life that recompile
> endlessly the same stuff.
>
> Why can't you wait to get a cease-and-desist letter from openssl before
> breaking things?
>
> Peter
>
>

All that we "broke" was our own website package list.  The list that
your system sees is accurate.

When we next generate a binary distribution, it will have a perfectly
good SSL-enabled svn, because we have one in our stable source tree.
On the other hand, since the project is extremely resource-limited, it
is difficult to do so.

Now instead of using bad language, you might consider our "unofficial"
binary distribution:

deb  http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/apt/10.4 unstable main crypto

which has binaries even from the unstable tree available.

>
> >Peter Lampione wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > I have fink version 0.8.1, and it seems that the package svn-client-ssl is
> > > missing.  However, svn-client does not let me use svn over https.
> > > What gives?
> > > What am I to do?
> > >
> > > I thank you for any help!  Here is the output:
> > >
> > >
> > >> sudo apt-get install svn-client-ssl
> > >>
> > > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > > Package svn-client-ssl has no available version, but exists in the
> > > database.
> > > This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and
> > > never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents
> > > of sources.list
> > > However the following packages replace it:
> > >   svn
> > > E: Package svn-client-ssl has no installation candidate
> > >
> > >
> > >> fink -V
> > >>
> > > Package manager version: 0.25.3
> > > Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc
> > >
> > >
> > What gives is that version of svn-client-ssl was removed from the binary
> > distribution, due to our interpretation of the OpenSSL license.
> > Unfortunately, it's a pain to edit the package database on the website,
> > so it is still listed there.
> >
> > You'll have to install it from source (and you'll get a later version,
> > too).
> >
> > --
> > Alexander K. Hansen
> > Fink User Liason/Documenter
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
>


-- 
Alexander K. Hansen
(akh)
Fink Documenter (still)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to