Martin Costabel wrote: > Jean-Francois Mertens wrote: > > David Lowe wrote: > > > >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../include/ > >> quicktime -DLIBOSS_INTERNAL -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/sw/include -I/sw/ > >> include -mtune=G5 -mpowerpc64 -mpowerpc-gpopt -falign-loops=16 - > >> mtune=G5 -O3 -funroll-all-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -finline- > >> functions -Wall -Winline -c x264.c -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/x264.o > >> x264.c: In function 'encode': > >> x264.c:496: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named > >> 'i_rf_constant' > >> x264.c: In function 'set_parameter': > >> x264.c:658: error: 'struct <anonymous>' has no member named > >> 'i_rf_constant' > > > > removing libx264-dev should get you off the hook; > > libquicktime0 is probably too old to use that pkg's x264.h > > Google tells that other distributions have patched their x246.c by > replacing i_rf_constant with f_rf_constant in the 3 lines where it appears. > So what scenario should we go with here?
1) Patch libx264 and have libquicktime0 declare appropriate BuildDepends/Depends on the libx264 family members? -or- 2) Explictly force libquicktime0 not to use our libx264* ? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
