On 04 Feb 2008, at 18:08, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Martin Costabel wrote: >> Jean-Francois Mertens wrote: >>> removing libx264-dev should get you off the hook; >>> libquicktime0 is probably too old to use that pkg's x264.h >> >> Google tells that other distributions have patched their x246.c by >> replacing i_rf_constant with f_rf_constant in the 3 lines where >> it appears. >> > So what scenario should we go with here? > > 1) Patch libx264 my understanding is that it is libquicktime0's x264.c that should be patched. Maybe I'll give it a try tonight. > and have libquicktime0 declare appropriate > BuildDepends/Depends on the libx264 family members? > > -or- > > 2) Explictly force libquicktime0 not to use our libx264* ? >
Would certainly prefer the first solution... but ideally do the work for an up to date libquicktime1.. JF ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
