On May 1, 2008, at 10:06 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:

>
> On May 1, 2008, at 8:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 1, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 1, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>>>
>>>> On ppc (G4) OSX 10.4.11 updating to clamav-0.92.1-52 failed with:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> /sw/lib/gcc4.3/bin/gcc -dynamiclib  -o .libs/libclamunrar.
>>>> 3.0.4.dylib  .libs/unrar15.o .libs/unrar.o .libs/unrar20.o .libs/
>>>> unrarppm.o .libs/unrarvm.o .libs/unrarcmd.o .libs/
>>>> unrarfilter.o .libs/unrarhlp.o  -L/sw/lib  -install_name  /sw/lib/
>>>> libclamunrar.3.dylib -Wl,-compatibility_version -Wl,4 -Wl,-
>>>> current_version -Wl,4.4
>>>> /usr/bin/ld: unknown flag: -compatibility_version
>>>> collect2: ld a retourné 1 code d'état d'exécution
>>>> make[2]: *** [libclamunrar.la] Error 1
>>>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>> ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.GiSEgx failed, exit code 2
>>>> Removing runtime build-lock...
>>>> Removing build-lock package...
>>>> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-clamav-0.92.1-52
>>>> (Reading database ... 360004 files and directories currently
>>>> installed.)
>>>> Removing fink-buildlock-clamav-0.92.1-52 ...
>>>> Failed: phase compiling: clamav-0.92.1-52 failed
>>>>
>>>> Note that the update went fine on ppc/intel OSX 10.5.2.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm currently attempting an update of clamav, also on OS 10.4.11  
>>> PPC;
>>> it has been running nearly six hours now (on a 1.67 MHz G4
>>> PowerBook). This seems unusual for a clamav update!
>>>
>>> Stan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is that clamav by itself, or building a gcc package to build it?
>>
>
> It appears to be the latter. After approximately 7.5 hrs, clamav
> apparently built. However, clamav3-shlibs failed. Following Jean-
> François's lead, I fink listed clamav and found:
>
>  i   clamav                      0.93-51
>      clamav-daemon               0.93-51
>      clamav-dev                  0.88.7-54
>  i   clamav-shlibs               0.88.7-54
>      clamav2-dev                 0.91.2-52
>  i   clamav2-shlibs              0.91.2-52
>      clamav3-dev                 0.92.1-52
> (i)  clamav3-shlibs              0.92.1-52
>      clamav4-dev                 0.93-51
>  i   clamav4-shlibs              0.93-51
>
> I don't quite understand why multiple copies of clamav were allowed
> to build. I have fink removed all but the 0.93.51 versions.
>
> Thanks for the comments and insights.
>
> Stan
>
>
>

The other shlibs and -dev packages exist in accordance with Fink's  
shared library policy--they're left around to prevent breakage so that  
maintainers can make whatever updates need to be done for their new  
versions--or so that their packages can be kept around if they _can't_  
be updated to use a newer version of a library.

I'm not sure why the clamav3 would build once, but not update.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to