Hi,

On May 2, 2008, at 4:06 AM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2008, at 8:38 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 1, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Stan Sanderson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 1, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>>>
>>>> On ppc (G4) OSX 10.4.11 updating to clamav-0.92.1-52 failed with:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> /sw/lib/gcc4.3/bin/gcc -dynamiclib  -o .libs/libclamunrar.
>>>> 3.0.4.dylib  .libs/unrar15.o .libs/unrar.o .libs/unrar20.o .libs/
>>>> unrarppm.o .libs/unrarvm.o .libs/unrarcmd.o .libs/
>>>> unrarfilter.o .libs/unrarhlp.o  -L/sw/lib  -install_name  /sw/lib/
>>>> libclamunrar.3.dylib -Wl,-compatibility_version -Wl,4 -Wl,-
>>>> current_version -Wl,4.4
>>>> /usr/bin/ld: unknown flag: -compatibility_version
>>>> collect2: ld a retourné 1 code d'état d'exécution
>>>> make[2]: *** [libclamunrar.la] Error 1
>>>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>> ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.GiSEgx failed, exit code 2
>>>> Removing runtime build-lock...
>>>> Removing build-lock package...
>>>> /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-clamav-0.92.1-52
>>>> (Reading database ... 360004 files and directories currently
>>>> installed.)
>>>> Removing fink-buildlock-clamav-0.92.1-52 ...
>>>> Failed: phase compiling: clamav-0.92.1-52 failed
>>>>
>>>> Note that the update went fine on ppc/intel OSX 10.5.2.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm currently attempting an update of clamav, also on OS 10.4.11  
>>> PPC;
>>> it has been running nearly six hours now (on a 1.67 MHz G4
>>> PowerBook). This seems unusual for a clamav update!
>>>
>>> Stan
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is that clamav by itself, or building a gcc package to build it?
>>
>
> It appears to be the latter. After approximately 7.5 hrs, clamav
> apparently built. However, clamav3-shlibs failed. Following Jean-
> François's lead, I fink listed clamav and found:
>
>  i   clamav                      0.93-51
>      clamav-daemon               0.93-51
>      clamav-dev                  0.88.7-54
>  i   clamav-shlibs               0.88.7-54
>      clamav2-dev                 0.91.2-52
>  i   clamav2-shlibs              0.91.2-52
>      clamav3-dev                 0.92.1-52
> (i)  clamav3-shlibs              0.92.1-52
>      clamav4-dev                 0.93-51
>  i   clamav4-shlibs              0.93-51
>
> I don't quite understand why multiple copies of clamav were allowed
> to build. I have fink removed all but the 0.93.51 versions.
>
> Thanks for the comments and insights.

Sorry for the troubles. I don't have the possibility to test on ppc  
right now. I will revert clamav 0.92.1 back to use gcc42, but leave  
the latest clamav (0.93) with gcc43.

The reason to have several version is that the shlibs major version  
change from each new major release to the next. Therefore, the old  
shlibs (and the corresponding dev packages) remain for compatibility  
reasons. You can remove those if you wish (hint: debfoster can take  
care of cleaning out unused libraries).

Remi



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Reply via email to