Hi Martin and Alexander, Alexander: yes, I did install after rebuilding, and still the name list in *.fink.la included the 1.3 version.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Martin Costabel <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > Which version of fontconfig2-dev is this? I fixed such a bug a couple of > weeks ago in 2.4.1-105. Interesting. The version that I have is 2.4.1-104, just one before your update. I configured fink to use only the stable releases, I guess you are working on the unstable ones. When do you think that your bugfix will be available in the stable tree? I tried: fink install fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-105 and fink --trees=unstable/main install fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-105 ... and that failed. From the man page I understand that I need to "upgrade" my fink.conf to include the unstable tree. For all other packages I want the stable versions though, so I would be happier if the stable tree could be fixed by including the 2.4.1-105 of the fontconfig2 packages. Thanks, David ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
