David Boersma wrote: > Hi Martin and Alexander, > > Alexander: yes, I did install after rebuilding, and still the name > list in *.fink.la included the 1.3 version. > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Martin Costabel <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > >> Which version of fontconfig2-dev is this? I fixed such a bug a couple of >> weeks ago in 2.4.1-105. >> > > Interesting. The version that I have is 2.4.1-104, just one before > your update. I configured fink to use only the stable releases, I > guess you are working on the unstable ones. When do you think that > your bugfix will be available in the stable tree? > > I tried: > fink install fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-105 > and > fink --trees=unstable/main install fontconfig2-dev-2.4.1-105 > > ... and that failed. From the man page I understand that I need to > "upgrade" my fink.conf to include the unstable tree. For all other > packages I want the stable versions though, so I would be happier if > the stable tree could be fixed by including the 2.4.1-105 of the > fontconfig2 packages. > > Thanks, > David > Current/unstable is 2.4.1-106, for what it's worth. I've cc'ed the maintainer since he needs to sign off on a move to stable.
(Also, in the Fink world, 'stable' often means "petrified") -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
