On 6/28/2012 11:51 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/28/12 8:44 PM, Bill Waggoner wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Alexander Hansen >>> <alexanderk.han...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Sure. We're in the process of updating our Debian-based toolset. The >>> "debiantools" package got updated, and it has a much larger dependency >>> tree than it used to. >>> >>> -- >>> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. >>> Fink User Liaison >>> My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ >>> >> Ah! Progress is generally good even if it brings some slight pain. >> >> My pain, after adjusting the mirrors is: >> >> [snip] >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/utils/fondu_060102-1_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/appleotffonts_0.1-11_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/applesystemfonts_1.1-3_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/openmotif3-bin_2.2.4-7_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/openmotif3-shlibs_2.2.4-7_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/openmotif3_2.2.4-7_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/xfontpath_0.4-16_darwin-x86_64.deb >> New package: >> dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/x11/xinitrc_1.5-1_darwin-x86_64.deb >> Failed: Problem resolving dependencies. Check for circular dependencies. >> >> And a fink update-all shows: >> >> % fink update-all >> Password: >> Information about 5053 packages read in 1 seconds. >> >> fink needs help picking an alternative to satisfy a virtual >> dependency. The candidates: >> >> (1) texlive-base: Base programs for a TeX Live installation >> (2) texlive-nox-base: Base programs for a TeX Live installation >> >> Pick one: [1] >> >> Which showed up in the selfupdate IIRC. >> >> I will await your sage words! >> >> Bill W >> > > I'm not sure what's pulling texlive in. I'm not happy about that. ;-)
This is the dependency chain: debianutils BD-> po4a -> BD-> docbook-utils D-> jadetex, which is provided by texlive. po4a is the real culprit here. It's dependency list is just too heavy. DescDetail says that it comes with 9 modules. Are these modules all needed for debianutils? Can they be moved off into a separate package (NOT a SplitOff), and then only have debianutils use the basic library? Or can debianutils not use po4a at all? Hanspeter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
