It might be easier to do a fresh checkout of trunk rather than copying
files around.

What happens if you put a print statement here
<http://matforge.org/fipy/browser/trunk/fipy/meshes/numMesh/cylindricalGrid1D.py#L78>?
The method wasn't in the older version..

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Eduard Manley <celez1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I get again the first one....
> As said  before I copied the files in the dir fipy/meshes/numMesh and did a
> new install. It's wrong or there is something else....
>
> Thanks
>
>> Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:10:45 -0400
>> From: daniel.wheel...@gmail.com
>> To: fipy@nist.gov
>> Subject: Re: Problem in solving Poisson equation with 1D Cylindrical mesh
>>
>>
>> An older version of fipy (tr...@3480, for example) gives,
>>
>> In [1]: from fipy import *
>> m = CylindricalGrid1D(dx=(1.,2.))
>>
>> /users/wd15/Documents/python/fipy/tr...@3480/fipy/viewers/gnuplotViewer/gnuplot1DViewer.py:76:
>> Warning: 'with' will become a reserved keyword in Python 2.6
>> In [2]: m = CylindricalGrid1D(dx=(1.,2.))
>> In [3]:
>> In [4]:
>> In [5]: m.getCellVolumes()
>> Out[5]: array([ 0.5, 16. ])
>>
>> The latest version of trunk gives,
>>
>> In [1]: from fipy import *
>> In [2]: m = CylindricalGrid1D(dx=(1.,2.))
>> In [3]: m.getCellVolumes()
>> Out[3]: array([ 0.5, 4. ])
>>
>> What do you get?
>>
>> On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Eduard Manley <celez1...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > thanks for your reply.
>> >
>> > I copied the files in the install dir (right subdir) and did a new
>> > install
>> > of fipy (completely new install on other pc), it should be ok but I
>> > tried
>> > running the code and the result is the same as before and so is wrong.
>> >
>> > I am doing some error?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >> Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:51:39 -0400
>> >> From: daniel.wheel...@gmail.com
>> >> To: fipy@nist.gov
>> >> Subject: Re: Problem in solving Poisson equation with 1D Cylindrical
>> >> mesh
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> With any luck this has now been dealt with. Latest versions of
>> >> branches/version-2_1 and trunk/ should now have the fixes for
>> >> <http://matforge.org/fipy/ticket/294>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Eduard Manley <celez1...@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > thanks for your reply.
>> >> >
>> >> > You can find attached a sample problem.
>> >> >
>> >> > The equation is a heat equation, variable is temperature,other and
>> >> > transient
>> >> > and diffusion term, there is a spatially varying source term (q)
>> >> > computed
>> >> > by analytical expression which is and hyperbola.
>> >> >
>> >> > We should reach about 100°C in 30-35 sec and the shape of the
>> >> > solution
>> >> > should be similiar to and hyperbola.
>> >> >
>> >> > As it is now the file works fine (mesh declared with:  mesh =
>> >> > CylindricalGrid1D(dr=dr, nr=(len(DR))) + (r_int,) ) but if you define
>> >> > the
>> >> > mesh with ( mesh = CylindricalGrid1D(dx=DR) + (r_int,) ) the result
>> >> > you
>> >> > obtain are wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> > The 2 declaration of CylindricalGrid1D should be the same, the face
>> >> > and
>> >> > cell
>> >> > centers are the same, but the result are different.
>> >> >
>> >> > You can observe the same problem also when solving the same equation
>> >> > but without transient term
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> >           Eduard
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:45:24 -0400
>> >> >> From: daniel.wheel...@gmail.com
>> >> >> To: fipy@nist.gov
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Problem in solving Poisson equation with 1D Cylindrical
>> >> >> mesh
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can you put together the simplest script possible that demonstrates
>> >> >> the problem and I'll try and debug it? Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Eduard Manley
>> >> >> <celez1...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Thanks for your reply.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I probably found the reason of the problem.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As said before I'm trying to solve an eq of this type:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > A(d phi/d t) =  div (D grad phi) + q
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > where A and D are costant coefficient and q is a spatially varying
>> >> >> > heat
>> >> >> > source.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The problem is in how I create the cylindrical 1D mesh (origin of
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > mesh
>> >> >> > is not in 0.).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > It doesn't matter if the discretization is logarithmic or uniform
>> >> >> > but
>> >> >> > how I
>> >> >> > declare it:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > (using a uniform spacing:)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > **  mesh = CylindricalGrid1D(dx=dr, nx=(len(DR))) + (r_int,)  **
>> >> >> > SHOULD BE EQUAL TO:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > **  mesh = CylindricalGrid1D(dx=DR) + (r_int,)  **
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > [dr = 5e-04, nr=58, r_int=0.00125, DR is a list which contains the
>> >> >> > various
>> >> >> > dx(58 elements of value dr for uniform grid)]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > BUT It is NOT.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The mesh (cell centers, facecenters) is ok but the results are
>> >> >> > NOT.
>> >> >> > The results are right only if I create the mesh using dx=dr and
>> >> >> > nx=.
>> >> >> > .
>> >> >> > And this is why before I thought the problem was the logaritmic
>> >> >> > discretization (must use DR=[...]).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > As said before with Cylindrical 2D mesh results are
>> >> >> > instead correct.
>> >> >> > Is this a bug?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:11:10 -0400
>> >> >> >> From: daniel.wheel...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> To: fipy@nist.gov
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Problem in solving Poisson equation with 1D
>> >> >> >> Cylindrical
>> >> >> >> mesh
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Edward, This may be to do with having a very small volume (or
>> >> >> >> area
>> >> >> >> or
>> >> >> >> line or point) for the inner most element of the domain. It
>> >> >> >> should
>> >> >> >> be
>> >> >> >> the same whether one is using a 1D or 2D mesh. Since you are
>> >> >> >> getting
>> >> >> >> differences in the 1D and 2D case, it should be relatively easy
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> debug and figure out what's going on It could also be that the
>> >> >> >> boundary condition on the inner boundary as zero area and this is
>> >> >> >> causing issues. Try shifting the grid by a small value away from
>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> zero point and see if things are improved I have always had this
>> >> >> >> issue with cylindrical grids and have never really had a
>> >> >> >> satisfactory
>> >> >> >> solution (other than shifting away from the zero point). If you
>> >> >> >> discover a better way to handle this, let me know. Cheers.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If you can't debug it, then send me the most minimalist scripts
>> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> show the issue and I'll give it a shot.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Eduard Manley
>> >> >> >> <celez1...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Problem partially solved:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I'm using a logarithmic discretization (first dr= 5e-04 and
>> >> >> >> > next
>> >> >> >> > dr increasing as 1.05)(with internal radius= 0.00125, external
>> >> >> >> > radius=0.03)
>> >> >> >> > and,
>> >> >> >> > for some unknown reason this create problems and wrong
>> >> >> >> > result with
>> >> >> >> > cylindrical 1D mesh. I tried using a uniform discretization
>> >> >> >> > (dr=5e-04
>> >> >> >> > nx=58)
>> >> >> >> > and now the result is correct.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > However I need to use the logarithmic discr. so after some
>> >> >> >> > hours
>> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> > sleep
>> >> >> >> > I'll think about the reason.....
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > ________________________________
>> >> >> >> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up
>> >> >> >> > now.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >> Daniel Wheeler
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ________________________________
>> >> >> > Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free Sign
>> >> >> > up
>> >> >> > now.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Daniel Wheeler
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > ________________________________
>> >> > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
>> >> > Sign
>> >> > up
>> >> > now.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Daniel Wheeler
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Wheeler
>>
>>
>
> ________________________________
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.



-- 
Daniel Wheeler


Reply via email to