> Specifically, do these various courts mysteriously change their tune when > wounded criminals show up in court suing on the theory that "the defendant > used deadly force against me by discharging a firearm in my direction, yet > must have felt that deadly force was not immediately justified since he > purposely shot to miss?"
Also, is the legal danger to warning/peripheral shots one of the wrath of the court, or the wrath of the lawyer who will sue for damage? In other words, a dead perp cannot bankrupt you in court. -------------------- Guy Smith Silicon Strategies Marketing 630 Taylor Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 510-521-4477 (T) 510-217-9693 (F) [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.SiliconStrat.com _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
