On 5/29/04 1:57 AM, "C. D. Tavares" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the unsinkable "duty to retreat" doctrine. Curiously, the Supreme
> Court has several times struck down this doctrine on the federal level,
> most notably in Alberty v. US, 162 US 499, when it struck down a lower
> court instruction that:
Interesting, though not relevant to my personal decision making. Whether
statute or case law require it or not, I would rather retreat than shoot
another person, assuming I can do so safely.
--
Bob Woolley
St. Paul, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I'm Bob Woolley, and I approved this message."
-- Bob Woolley
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
