Mike,
you are right, local law still is enforceable. However, as a temorarily "federalized" location, federal law would also apply, and carry permits would be "invalid" at that location for the designated time, in the same manner they are at federal office buildings.
Paul
>From: "Mike Riddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Mike Riddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Paul Laska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: statute-presidential protection
>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:04:03 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from lakermmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.240.35]) by mc11-f18.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:03:53 -0700
>Received: from Enigmobile ([68.99.15.139]) by lakermmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:03:51 -0400
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEuRvAKCYyI84dzvWkZEj2K
>Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;1)
>In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 20:03:53.0772 (UTC) FILETIME=[738266C0:01C4A1A8]
>
>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:43:10 +0000, Paul Laska wrote:
>
> >Remember that once the site is "designated" by the Sec. of
> >Treasury, it becomes a temporary Federal property, and local laws
> >are suspended, and federal laws take effect.
>
>
>Well, DOJ appears to disagree with you:
>http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01550.htm
>
> "Section 1752 of Title 18 does not supersede any existing State or
>local laws regarding the maintenance of order and the protection of persons
>and property in any jurisdiction. Accordingly, all State and local criminal
>laws remain available as a basis for concurrent jurisdiction for
>enforcement, investigative, and prosecutorial involvement by State and
>local criminal justice agencies over conduct which constitutes a violation
>of State or local law as well as a violation of � 1752. Local law
>enforcement agencies continue to have the responsibility to assist in
>providing protection to the President while the President is visiting their
>localities, to conduct criminal investigations involving violations of
>State and local statutes which result from a Presidential visit, and to
>furnish police officers in adequate numbers to control demonstrations and
>other disturbances occurring in close proximity to places where the
>President is visiting. S. Rep. No. 91-1252, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 9-10
>(1970).
>
> "Difficulties in proving the elements of guilty knowledge or scienter
>required for violation of the Federal statute may leave local action as the
>only effective recourse in many instances, unless previous removal from the
>restricted area, other enforcement encounter, or special circumstances are
>present and serve to prove the defendant acted willfully and with
>knowledge."
>
>
>
>
