Generally, there is no prohibition at federal buildings. See 18 USC sec 930 (d) (3) exception.
*********************************************************************** Professor Joseph Olson Hamline University School of Law tel. (651) 523-2142 St. Paul, Minnesota 55104-1284 fax. (651) 523-2236 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> "Paul Laska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/23/04 03:22PM >>> However, as a temorarily >>> "federalized" location, federal law would also apply, and carry permits would be >>> "invalid" at that location for the designated time, in the same manner they are at >>> federal office buildings. Paul >From: "Mike Riddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Mike Riddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Paul Laska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: statute-presidential protection >Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:04:03 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lakermmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.240.35]) by mc11-f18.hotmail.com with >Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:03:53 -0700 >Received: from Enigmobile ([68.99.15.139]) by lakermmtao04.cox.net >(InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL >PROTECTED]>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:03:51 -0400 >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEuRvAKCYyI84dzvWkZEj2K >Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;1) >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 20:03:53.0772 (UTC) FILETIME=[738266C0:01C4A1A8] > >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:43:10 +0000, Paul Laska wrote: > > >Remember that once the site is "designated" by the Sec. of > >Treasury, it becomes a temporary Federal property, and local laws > >are suspended, and federal laws take effect. > > >Well, DOJ appears to disagree with you: >http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01550.htm > > "Section 1752 of Title 18 does not supersede any existing State or >local laws regarding the maintenance of order and the protection of persons >and property in any jurisdiction. Accordingly, all State and local criminal >laws remain available as a basis for concurrent jurisdiction for >enforcement, investigative, and prosecutorial involvement by State and >local criminal justice agencies over conduct which constitutes a violation >of State or local law as well as a violation of � 1752. Local law >enforcement agencies continue to have the responsibility to assist in >providing protection to the President while the President is visiting their >localities, to conduct criminal investigations involving violations of >State and local statutes which result from a Presidential visit, and to >furnish police officers in adequate numbers to control demonstrations and >other disturbances occurring in close proximity to places where the >President is visiting. S. Rep. No. 91-1252, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. 9-10 >(1970). > > "Difficulties in proving the elements of guilty knowledge or scienter >required for violation of the Federal statute may leave local action as the >only effective recourse in many instances, unless previous removal from the >restricted area, other enforcement encounter, or special circumstances are >present and serve to prove the defendant acted willfully and with >knowledge." > > > > _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
