There's an interesting state constitutional right to bear arms
discussion in the concurrences to State v. Gurske, 2005 WL 2038536
(Wash. Supreme Ct. Aug. 25). It's particularly interesting because the
concurrences would recognize that the right to bear arms to some extent
limits armed-with-a-deadly-weapon sentence enhancements even for people
convicted of other crimes (here, possession of methamphetamine). The
opinions are here:
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.opindisp&docid=7
51561MAJ
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.opindisp&docid=7
51561CO1
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.opindisp&docid=7
51561CO2
Eugene
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
