------ Forwarded Message From: "law.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:35:00 -0700 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Law.com Newswire, Sept. 16, 2005: Roberts Concludes Three Days of Testimony
Insurer Not Required to Defend Homeowner Who Shot Intruder <http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1126775114950> New York Law Journal In a case that illustrates a debate that has divided courts across the country, a divided New York appellate panel ruled Thursday that a man who killed an intruder in his home in self-defense is not entitled to insurance defense in a wrongful death action. The panel strictly construed the insurance policy language in holding that because the defendant shot the decedent at close range with a 12-gauge shotgun, the action triggered an exception for incidents that are "expected or intended" by the insured. ------ End of Forwarded Message _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
