Robert writes: >Insurer Not Required to Defend Homeowner Who Shot Intruder ><http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1126775114950> >New York Law Journal > > ... The panel strictly construed the >insurance policy language in holding that because the defendant shot the >decedent at close range with a 12-gauge shotgun, the action triggered an >exception for incidents that are "expected or intended" by the insured.
I put a railing on the stairway to my front door, and put a rubber mat under the throw rug at the entry. I guess that means a visitor falling is an incident that I "expected or intended". ??? -- --henry schaffer _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
