Here's an article from the current King County Bar Bulletin (Seattle, Washington and surrounding area), on the front page, below the fold in the paper version.  I'm not sure how long the link will last:
 
 
Here's the lede (after setting out the actual amendment):

Just one little sentence containing ambiguous (to put it kindly) grammar and punctuation. If only the founding fathers could have predicted that the most poorly written sentence in the Constitution would be the cause of so much heated debate to this day, perhaps they would have spent more time editing the Bill of Rights.

What did they have in mind when they left us this language? Did they intend to grant us an individual civil right or a collective right held by our state governments?

The article also mentions the DOJ position.
 
Eric R. Stahlfeld
145 SW 155th St., Ste 101
Seattle, WA 98166
(206) 248-8016
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to