In her note "Prying the Second Amendment's Meaning from the Founders' Cold Dead
Hands" at 
http://www.kcba.org/scriptcontent/KCBA/barbulletin/current/article1.cfm  
Sarah Kaltsounis treats the Second Amendment as if it was written "A well
regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of
the MILITIA to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."  There are many
examples that illustrate her mind-set, but a simple one is her statement 'There
doesn't seem to be any indication that the framers intended to grant this right
to women, who were completely excluded from all historical definitions of
"militia."' 

Ms. Kaltsounis has failed in the most elemental way to interpret the Second
Amendment the way it was written which is: "A well regulated Militia, being
necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the PEOPLE to keep and
bear Arms, shall not be infringed."  The founders would recognize women as
belonging to the PEOPLE (although at the time, only free white women likely) and
as a challenge I ask anyone to show an example of a gun control law passed by
Congress or the State Legislatures prior to 1900 which specifically excluded
women from owning firearms.

The subordinate clause in the Second Amendment is giving the founders view of an
important reason for the PEOPLE to have the right to arms.  Consistent with that
view, as Ms. Kaltsounis observes, Congress passed laws requiring members of the
militia (defined for practical purposes as white males of a certain age) to arm
themselves.  However, Congress cannot define the PEOPLE and didn't.  Moreover,
certain people are excluded from membership in the Militia (specifically, some
members of the government and clergy) and no one would imagine these PEOPLE
could be disarmed.

So, before anyone races to join her legal test case to see 'what role we play in
the "well-regulated militia,"' you should understand that you do not have to
play any militia role to avail yourself of your rights protected by the Second
Amendment -- you have only to belong to the PEOPLE of the United States of 
America.

Sincerely,
Philip F. Lee





Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Here's an article from the current King County Bar Bulletin  (Seattle, 
> Washington and surrounding area), on the front page, below the fold in  the
> paper version.  I'm not sure how long the link will last:
>  
> http://www.kcba.org/scriptcontent/KCBA/barbulletin/current/article1.cfm 
>  





-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to